Berean Truth Series
Berean Truth Series – Correcting Contradictions To Expose Truth

The Claim:

HATRED TO THE EDOMITE SANCTIONED.

He [Amaziah] slew of Edom, in the valley of Salt, ten thousand . . . And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord. (, 3.)

HATRED TO THE EDOMITE FORBIDDEN.

Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite, for he is thy brother. (.)

(Note: The term “Hate / Hatred” is NOT mentioned in either verse as the Author expresses it)

 

Truth With Proof:

1. Scriptural Ledger & Full Text Verification

Under the Berean mandate (), we must examine the full text of each scripture provided, verifying the wording across both the King James Version and the New International Version to expose the context often removed by critics.

Passage A: The Military Campaign Against Edom

, 7
  • KJV (v. 3): “And he did that which was right in the sight of the LORD, yet not like David his father: he did according to all things as Joash his father did.”
  • KJV (v. 7): “He slew of Edom in the valley of salt ten thousand, and took Selah by war, and called the name of it Joktheel unto this day.”
  • NIV (v. 3): “He did what was right in the eyes of the LORD, but not as his father David had done. In everything he followed the example of his father Joash.”
  • NIV (v. 7): “He was the one who defeated ten thousand Edomites in the Valley of Salt and captured Sela in battle, calling it Joktheel, the name it has to this day.”
 

Passage B: The Moral Law Regarding Edomites

  • KJV: “Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land.”
  • NIV: “Do not despise an Edomite, for the Edomites are related to you. Do not despise an Egyptian, because you resided as foreigners in their country.”

2. High-Level Pattern Recognition: Civil Law vs. National Security

The surface contradiction assumes that a nation going to war is synonymous with a command to personally “hate” a race of people. It conflates Civil/Moral Law (how an individual treats a neighbor) with State/Military Action (how a sovereign nation responds to armed rebellion).
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                        PERSONAL DISPOSITION VS. STATE MILITARY ACTION                  │
├───────────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ DEUTERONOMY 23:7 (THE MORAL LAW)  │ 2 KINGS 14:7 (THE HISTORICAL LEDGER)               │
├───────────────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ • Realm: Individual heart & civil │ • Realm: National sovereignty & warfare            │
│   integration into the assembly.  │ • Trigger: Edom's violent military rebellion       │
│ • Mandate: Do not harbor innate   │   against Judah (2 Kings 8:20).                    │
│   racial detestation.             │ • Action: Suppressing an armed insurrection.       │
│ • Reason: Shared ancestry (Esau). │ • Note: A state can fight a war (even a civil war  │
│                                   │   against "brothers") without violating the moral  │
│                                   │   law against personal malice.                     │
└───────────────────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Furthermore, notice the text of . It does not say, “He killed Edomites, AND THIS was right in the sight of the Lord.” It is a general summary of the beginning of Amaziah’s reign. In fact, if we cross-reference , we see that after this exact battle, Amaziah brought back the gods of Edom and worshipped them—an act that brought severe divine judgment upon him. God did not “sanction hatred“; He recorded a military history.

3. Linguistic Precision: The Hebrew Root Words

The original Hebrew exposes the flaw in the claim immediately.
  • The Word for “Abhor/Despise” (): Ta’ab (תָּעַב)

    • Strong’s H8581: To loathe, detest, or consider abominable.
    • This is a word of the heart and mind. The Torah strictly forbade the Israelites from harboring innate racial disgust or prejudice against the Edomites because they were the descendants of Esau, Jacob’s twin brother. They were to be allowed into the assembly of the Lord in the third generation (Deuteronomy 23:8).
  • The Word for “Slew/Defeated” (): Nakah (נָכָה)

    • Strong’s H5221: To strike, smite, attack, or conquer.
    • This is a military/kinetic term. Amaziah did not execute 10,000 civilians out of racial prejudice; his army clashed with the Edomite army in the Valley of Salt (the Arabah south of the Dead Sea).
 

4. Historical Verification: The Trigger for the War

Why was Amaziah fighting Edom in the first place? If we use the Berean method of cross-referencing the timeline, we find the cause a few chapters earlier.

During the reign of King Jehoram (Amaziah’s great-grandfather), Edom launched a violent insurrection:

“In his days Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah, and made a king over themselves… And the Edomites compassed him about, and the captains of the chariots: and the people fled into their tents.” ().
Edom had broken treaty, established a hostile monarchy, and begun raiding Judah’s southern borders. Amaziah’s campaign in the Valley of Salt was a military operation to secure the border and capture the Edomite stronghold of Sela (Petra). This was a defense of national sovereignty against an aggressive neighbor, completely detached from the individual moral command in .

5. Memory Tool: The E-S-A-U Framework

To quickly remember and present the Berean resolution to this alleged paradox, use the E-S-A-U memory anchor:
  • E — Ethnic Brotherhood: strictly protected their ethnic standing as “brothers” (descendants of Esau).
  • S — State Sovereignty: records a defensive state military action to secure a border, not a mandate for personal hatred.
  • A — Abhorrence Forbidden: The Hebrew word ta’ab (to loathe/abhor) targets the individual heart, forbidding racial prejudice.
  • U — Uprising Triggered It: The war was caused by Edom’s violent uprising (), requiring a military response (nakah).

Berean Verdict

There is no contradiction:
  1. is a civil and moral law forbidding individual Israelites from harboring internal racial disgust (ta’ab) toward the Edomites, enforcing their shared ancestral bond.
  2. is a historical record of a military state action (nakah) where the King of Judah suppressed a violent, multi-generational border rebellion by the nation of Edom.
Defending a nation’s sovereign borders against an organized army does not equate to God sanctioning personal, racial hatred. The scriptures harmonize perfectly when the difference between civil moral law and national historical warfare is understood.
 
BuiltByGod

By BuiltByGod

I’m Gary, the author and builder behind Berean Truth Ministry. I love Scripture, structure, and uncovering the patterns God embedded in His Word. I create studies, tools, and teaching resources to help people see the Bible with truth, clarity and confidence. Everything I teach comes from my own study, prayer and personal walk with God. My mission is simple: strengthen believers, answer hard questions, and point people to Jesus with truth, proof, and understanding allowing others to seek and find salvation.

Leave a Reply

Need Prayer?